An interview with John Grinder October 2008. Q3. What’s ethical in NLP training and counselling and what’s not
{ 2010 08 22 }
Neuro Linguistic Programming Blog
{ 2010 08 22 }
An interview with John Grinder October 2008. Q3. What’s ethical in NLP training and counselling and what’s not
missgj1 | 24-Aug-10 at 10:23 am | Permalink
Spot on Mr Grinder! I like it
Crashof2008 | 24-Aug-10 at 1:34 pm | Permalink
I wish this had been emphasized more at the beginning of NLP.
One of the reasons why I became disillusioned with the technology at the time of its invention by John and Rich was that much of the emphasis seemed focused on how to get people to buy more consumer goods.
Having studied radical political economy with John and Claudia Carr, this seemed at variance towards the goal of seeking an economic system that was more humane and rational.
professorsnapper | 27-Aug-10 at 10:20 am | Permalink
The issue is not that this is “f***d up”, the issue is how quickly a person realises that their every interaction involves their use of influence skills (consciously / effectively or not), and how quickly they then take responsibility for their own actions, and act ethically in dealing with others.
As you look into Grinder’s work more, you’ll begin to see this for yourself, and hear the sense in what he’s saying. To get a better grasp of this, look up the concept of “ecology” in New Code NLP.
stevenlathamgolf | 27-Aug-10 at 3:08 pm | Permalink
so respectful, i like it
buewgewstmeiers | 30-Aug-10 at 12:47 am | Permalink
thats why its fucked up cuz someone not even trying to impose probably will, so imagine a madman with it